![]()
![]()
for
Chapter 4 Sequences, Julia and Mandelbrot Sets, and Power Series
Overview
In 1980 Benoit
Mandelbrot led a team of mathematicians in producing
some stunning computer graphics from very simple rules for
manipulating complex numbers. This event marked the
beginning of a new branch of mathematics, known as fractal geometry,
that has some amazing applications. Many of the tools
needed to appreciate Mandelbrot's work are contained in this
chapter. We look at extensions to the complex domain of
sequences and series, ideas that are familiar to students who have
completed a standard calculus course.
4.1 Sequences and Series
In formal terms, a complex sequence is a
function whose domain is the positive integers and whose range is a
subset of the complex numbers. The following are examples of
sequences:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For convenience, at times we use the term
sequence rather than complex sequence. If we want a
function s to represent an arbitrary
sequence, we can specify it by writing
, and
so on. The values
, are
called the terms of a sequence, and mathematicians, being generally
lazy when it comes to such things, often refer to
as the sequence itself, even though they are really speaking of the
range of the sequence when they do so. You will usually
see a sequence written as
,
,
or when the indices are understood, as
. Mathematicians
are also not so fussy about starting a sequence
at
,
so that
,
,
etc., would also be acceptable notation, provided all terms were
defined. For example, the sequence r
given by Equation (4-4) could be written
in a variety of ways:
,
,
,
,
,
...
The sequences f
and g given by Equations
(4-1) and
(4-2) behave differently as n
gets larger. The terms in Equation
(4-1) approach
, but
those in
Equation (4-2) do
not approach any particular number, as they oscillate around the
eight eighth roots of unity on the unit
circle. Informally, the sequence
has
as
its limit as n approaches infinity, provided
the terms
can
be made as close as we want to
by
making n large enough. When this
happens, we write
(4-5)
.
If
, we
say that the sequence
converges
to
.
We need a rigorous definition for Statement
(4-5), however, if we are to do honest
mathematics.
Definition 4.1 (Limit
of a
Sequence).
means
that for any real number
there
corresponds a positive integer
(which
depends on
) such
that
whenever
. That
is
whenever
. Figure
4.1 illustrates a convergent sequence.
![[Graphics:Images/ComplexSequenceSeriesMod_gr_52.gif]](complexsequenceseries/ComplexSequenceSeriesMod/Images/ComplexSequenceSeriesMod_gr_52.gif)
Figure
4.1 A sequence
that converges to
. (If
then
.)
Remark 4.1. The reason we use
the notation
is to emphasize the fact that this number depends on our choice of
. Sometimes
it will be convenient to drop the subscript.
In form, Definition 4.1 is exactly the same as the corresponding definition for limits of real sequences. In fact, a simple criterion casts the convergence of complex sequences in terms of the convergence of real sequences.
Theorem
4.1. Let
and
. Then
(4-6)
, iff
(4-7)
.
Proof of Theorem 4.1 is in the book.
Complex Analysis for Mathematics and Engineering
Example 4.1. Find
the limit of the sequence
.
Solution. We write
. Using
results concerning sequences of real numbers, we find
that
and
.
Therefore
.
Example 4.2. Show
that the sequence
diverges.
Solution. We have
The real sequences
and
both
exhibit divergent oscillations, so we conclude
that
diverges.
Definition 4.2 (Bounded
Sequence). A complex sequence
is bounded provided that there exists a positive real number
R and an integer N
such that
for
all
. In
other words, for
,
the sequence
is contained in the disk
.
Bounded sequences play an important role in some newer developments in complex analysis that are discussed in Section 4.2. A theorem from real analysis stipulates that convergent sequences are bounded. The same result holds for complex sequences.
Theorem 4.2. If
is a convergent sequence, then
is bounded.
As with real numbers, we also have the following definition.
Definition 4.3 (Cauchy
Sequence). The
sequence
is said to be a Cauchy
sequence if for every
there
exists a positive integer
, such
that if
, then
, or,
equivalently,
.
The following should now come as no surprise.
Theorem 4.3, (Cauchy Sequences
Converge). If
is
a Cauchy sequence, then
converges.
Proof of Theorem 4.3 is in the book.
Complex
Analysis for Mathematics and Engineering
One of the most important notions in
analysis (real or complex) is a theory that allows us to add up
infinitely many terms. To make sense of such an idea we
begin with a sequence
,
and form a new sequence
,
called the sequence of partial sums, as follows.
Definition 4.4 (Infinite
Series). The
formal expression
is
called an infinite series, and
, are
called the terms of the series.
If there is a complex number S
for which
,
we will say that the infinite series
converges to S, and that S
is the sum of the infinite series. When this occurs, we
write
.
The series
is
said to be absolutely convergent provided that the (real) series of
magnitudes
converges.
If a series does not converge, we say that it
diverges.
Remark 4.2. The
first finitely many terms of a series do not affect its convergence
or divergence and, in this respect, the beginning index of a series
is irrelevant. Thus, we will without comment conclude that
if a series
converges,
then so does
, where
is
any finite collection of terms. A similar remark holds for
determining divergence of a series.
As you might expect, many of the results concerning real series carry over to complex series. We now give several of the more standard theorems for complex series, along with examples of how they are used.
Theorem
4.4. Let
and
. Then
(converges)
if and only if both
(converge).
Proof of Theorem 4.4 is in the book.
Complex
Analysis for Mathematics and Engineering
Theorem
4.5. If
is
a convergent complex series, then
.
Example 4.3. Show
that the series
is
convergent.
Solution. Recall that the real
series
and
are
convergent. Hence, Theorem 4.4 implies that the given
complex series is convergent.
Example 4.4. Show
that the series
is
divergent.
Solution. We know that the real
series
is
divergent. Hence, Theorem 4.4 implies that the given
complex series is divergent.
Example 4.5. Show
that the series
is divergent.
Solution. Here we set
and
observe that
.
Thus
,
and Theorem 4.5 implies that the series is not
convergent; hence it is divergent.
Theorem
4.6. Let
be
convergent series, and let c be a complex
number. Then
and
.
Definition 4.5 (Cauchy
Product of
Series). Let
and
be
convergent series, where
are
complex numbers. The Cauchy
product of the two series is defined to be the
series
, where
.
Theorem 4.7. If the
Cauchy product converges, then
,
where
.
Proof.
The proof can be found in a number of texts, for example, Infinite Sequences and Series, by Konrad Knopp (translated by Frederick Bagemihl; New York: Dover, 1956).
Theorem
4.8 (Comparison
Test). Let
be
a convergent series of real nonnegative
terms. If
is
a sequence of complex numbers and
holds
for all n, then
converges.
Proof of Theorem 4.8 is in the book.
Complex
Analysis for Mathematics and Engineering
Corollary 4.1.
If
converges,
then
converges.
In other words, absolute convergence implies convergence for complex series as well as for real series.
Example 4.6. Show
that the series
is
convergent.
Solution. We calculate
. Using
the comparison test and the fact that
converges,
we determine that
converges
and hence, by Corollary 4.1, so does
.
Exercises Section 4.1. Sequences and Series
Download this Mathematica Notebook
The Next Module is
Return to the Complex Analysis Modules
Return to the Complex Analysis Project