Exercise
7.
.
Solution 7.
See text and/or instructor's solution manual.
Answer.
.
Solution. We use
the function
, where
the branch of the logarithm is
,
where
and
, (see
Equation (5-20) in Section
5.2), (notice that the branch cut is the
negative y-axis).
The path C of
integration will consist of the segments
and
of the x-axis
together with the upper semicircles
and
, for
, as
shown in the figure below.
![[Graphics:../Images/IntegralsBranchPointsModHome_gr_524.gif]](../Images/IntegralsBranchPointsModHome_gr_524.gif)
The
indented contour
for
the integrand ![]()
consists
of the large semi-circle
,
and a small semi-circle
,
and segments
along
the real axis.
The
point
that
lies inside the contour
.
Factor the denominator and
get
.
The zeros of
are
.
It follows that
has
simple poles at
.
Now evaluate the contour
integral of
over
.
We chose the branch
because
it is analytic on C and its
interior.
Applying the Cauchy Residue Theorem (see Theorem 8.1 in Section
8.1), we obtain:
Here the denominator of
has
a factor of the form
, and
.
We can write the contour
integral in the following form:
,
or
.
The ML-Inequality and a proof
similar to the one used to establish equation
(8-11) can be used to prove that:
and
(see
the complete details below).
Taking the limits as
we
obtain
,
then
,
then
,
then
,
then
.
Equating the real parts in this equation gives
.
From ordinary calculus we know that
.
Making this substitution, we get
,
which is easy to solve for the desired result
![]()
We are done.
For curiosity sake, the
imaginary part is
,
or
.
Aside. We can let Mathematica double check our work.
Maple can check our work too!
> V1
:= evalc( residue( (log(z))^2/(z^2+1), z=I ));
> V
:= evalc( 2*Pi*I*V1 );
> (
Pi^3/2 - Pi^3/4 )/2;
We are really done.
![[Graphics:../Images/IntegralsBranchPointsModHome_gr_570.gif]](../Images/IntegralsBranchPointsModHome_gr_570.gif)
A
portion of the "area under the curve"
.
We are really really done.
The complete details.
For completeness, we now give the
details for establishing
and
.
Use the ML-Inequality (Theorem 6.3 in Section
6.2) and a proof similar to the one used to establish
equation (8-11) of Theorem
8.3 to prove that:
.
For this example, for
, we
have the relations
![[Graphics:../Images/IntegralsBranchPointsModHome_gr_576.gif]](../Images/IntegralsBranchPointsModHome_gr_576.gif)
Now taking limits, we get
.
Therefore, it follows that
.
A similar proof shows that:
.
For this example, for
, we
have the relations
Now taking limits, we get
.
Therefore, it follows that
.
We are done with the details.
Aside. Both
and
are capable of finding the definite integral.
>
int( (log(x))^2/(x^2+1), x=0..infinity );
We are really really really done.
The above computation illustrates how the Residue
Calculus can be used to find Contour
Integrals with Integrands with Branch
Points.
Aside. For comparison,
we show how to find the value of the integral using the indefinite
integral.
![[Graphics:../Images/IntegralsBranchPointsModHome_gr_589.gif]](../Images/IntegralsBranchPointsModHome_gr_589.gif)
The
indefinite integral
. From
the graph we see that
.
Caveat. If you do
not trust the graphical explanation then you must trust the Residue
Calculus solution.
Or you could compute the Cauchy Principal value, but this will
require some very difficult limits.
The
Cauchy Principal Value (P.V.) of the integral
is
and
it can be computed as follows:
The indefinite integral will
involve the special function "PolyLog."
We do not want to develop this
special functions at this time and leave it for the reader to
investigate. It is interesting to observe that the current
software includes this function. For this type of problem
the Residue Calculus can get the answer without resorting to special
functions.
This solution is complements of the authors.
(c) 2008 John H. Mathews, Russell W. Howell