Exercise 11.  Let  [Graphics:Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_442.gif]  be a nonconstant analytic function in the closed disk  [Graphics:Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_443.gif].  

Suppose that  [Graphics:Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_444.gif]  for  [Graphics:Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_445.gif].  

Show that  [Graphics:Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_446.gif]  has a zero in  [Graphics:Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_447.gif].  

Hint:  Use both the maximum and minimum modulus principles.  

Solution 11.

See text and/or instructor's solution manual.

Solution.  (By contraposition)  If  [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_448.gif]  does not have a zero, then  [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_449.gif]  is analytic in  [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_450.gif],  

so by Theorem 6.15 (Maximum Modulus Principle) its maximum occurs on the boundary.  

Since  [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_451.gif]  for  [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_452.gif]  it follows that  

                    [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_453.gif]   for   [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_454.gif].

Which in turn implies that   [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_455.gif]  for     [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_456.gif].

The original hypothesis that  [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_457.gif]  for  [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_458.gif]  implies that  [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_459.gif]  for  [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_460.gif].

Thus we can infer that   [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_461.gif]  for  [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_462.gif],   thus

                    [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_463.gif]  for  [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_464.gif].

Now apply Theorem 3.6 in Section 3.2 where we proved that if [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_465.gif]  for  [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_466.gif] then  [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_467.gif]  is constant.  

Therefore we conclude that  [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_468.gif]  is constant.

But this contradicts the statement that  [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_469.gif]  be a nonconstant analytic function in the closed disk  [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_470.gif].  

Since we have arrived at a contradiction, our statement  "[Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_471.gif]  does not have a zero"  is false.

Therefore  [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_472.gif]  must have a zero in  [Graphics:../Images/LiouvilleMoreraGaussModHome_gr_473.gif].  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This solution is complements of the authors.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(c) 2008 John H. Mathews, Russell W. Howell