Exercise 3. Given
the recursion formula
.
3 (a). Calculate
the amplitude response
,
,
, and
.
3 (b). Discuss what
happens to the the filtered signal for the
input
.
Hint. This is similar to Examples 9.21 (b) and 9.21 (c).
Solution 3.
See text and/or instructor's solution manual.
Answer.
,
,
,
,
.
The signal component
is
amplified by the factor
.
The signal component
is
attenuated quite a bit by the factor
.
Solution 3
(a). Given the
filter
,
the transfer
function (9-27)
is
,
and formula (9-28) for the amplitude
response is
.
Now calculate
,
,
,
.
Solution 3
(b). From the above calculations we expect that
component
of
the signal is amplified by the factor
and the component
attenuated
quite a bit by the factor
.
Hence the filter almost eliminates the signal
component
which
is close to the "zero-out" frequency
.
We are done.
Aside. We can let Mathematica double check our work.
Aside. The Maple
commands are similar
We are really done.
Aside. We can graph
the amplitude response for the filter
.
![[Graphics:../Images/ZTransformFilterModHome_gr_424.gif]](../Images/ZTransformFilterModHome_gr_424.gif)
The
amplitude response
and
zero-pole plot of
,
for
the filter
.
The
higher frequencies are attenuated and
when
.
We are really really done.
Remark. The
transfer function is
,
and has conjugate zeros at
. The
argument of
is
,
and there is a zero amplitude response at
, i.
e.
.
Since
, we
can expect that
.
Also, the amplitude response is decreasing for values
of
in
the interval
.
We are really really really done.
Aside. We can graph the causal input sequence and the corresponding causal output sequence.
![[Graphics:../Images/ZTransformFilterModHome_gr_441.gif]](../Images/ZTransformFilterModHome_gr_441.gif)
The
input signal
and
output signal
.
The
higher frequencies are attenuated and
.
We
can see that the signal component
is
mostly eliminated.
This solution is complements of the authors.
(c) 2008 John H. Mathews, Russell W. Howell