Exercise 5. Given
the recursion formula
.
5 (a). Calculate
the amplitude response
,
,
, and
.
5 (b). Discuss what
happens to the the filtered signal for the
input
.
Solution 5.
See text and/or instructor's solution manual.
Answer.
,
,
,
,
.
The signal component
is
amplified by the factor
.
The signal component
is
attenuated by the factor
.
Solution 5
(a). Given the
filter
,
the transfer
function (9-27)
is
,
and formula (9-28) for the amplitude
response is
.
Now calculate
,
,
,
.
Solution 5
(b). From the above calculations we expect that
component
of
the signal is amplified by the factor
and the component
attenuated
by the factor
.
Hence the filter "boosted up" the signal
component
and
attenuates the signal component
.
Also, the filter reduces the proportion of the signal
component
by
a factor of
.
We are done.
Aside. We can let Mathematica double check our work.
Aside. The Maple
commands are similar
We are really done.
Aside. We can graph
the amplitude response for the filter
.
![[Graphics:../Images/ZTransformFilterModHome_gr_566.gif]](../Images/ZTransformFilterModHome_gr_566.gif)
The
amplitude response
, and
zero-pole plot of
,
for
the filter
.
There
is amplification for signals with
, and
attenuation for signals with
.
We are really really done.
Remark. The
transfer function is
,
and has conjugate poles at
.
The argument of
is
, and
there is a local maximum of the amplitude response
near
.
We are really really really done.
Aside. We can graph the causal input sequence and the corresponding causal output sequence.
![[Graphics:../Images/ZTransformFilterModHome_gr_578.gif]](../Images/ZTransformFilterModHome_gr_578.gif)
The
input signal
and
output signal
.
The
lower frequencies are "boosted up" near
and
.
The
higher frequencies are slightly attenuated
and
.
Remark. In Exercise
6 we will see what happens when we multiply the coefficient of the
term
by
.
This solution is complements of the authors.
(c) 2008 John H. Mathews, Russell W. Howell