Theorem 5.1 (The exponential function).  The function  [Graphics:Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_14.gif]  is an entire function satisfying the following conditions:

  (i).   [Graphics:Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_15.gif],  using Leibniz notation  [Graphics:Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_16.gif].  

(ii).   [Graphics:Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_17.gif],   i.e.   [Graphics:Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_18.gif].  

(iii).   If  [Graphics:Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_19.gif]  is a real number, then   [Graphics:Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_20.gif].  

The exponential function is a solution to the differential equation  [Graphics:Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_21.gif]  with the initial condition  [Graphics:Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_22.gif].  

Proof of Theorem 5.1.

    By the ratio test, the series in Definition 5.1 has an infinite radius of convergence, so  [Graphics:../Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_23.gif]  is an function.  Using termwise differentiation, we get  

            [Graphics:../Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_24.gif],  

which gives us part (i) of Theorem 5.1.

To prove part (ii), we let [Graphics:../Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_25.gif] be an arbitrary complex number and define [Graphics:../Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_26.gif] to be

            [Graphics:../Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_27.gif].

Using the product rule, chain rule, and part (i), we have

            [Graphics:../Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_28.gif].

Hence the function [Graphics:../Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_29.gif] must be a constant function.  Thus, for all z,  [Graphics:../Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_30.gif].   Since  [Graphics:../Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_31.gif]  (for the reader to verify!), we deduce

             [Graphics:../Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_32.gif].

Hence, for all z,

            [Graphics:../Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_33.gif].

Setting  [Graphics:../Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_34.gif]  and letting  [Graphics:../Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_35.gif],  we get

            [Graphics:../Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_36.gif].

which simplifies to be (ii) which is our desired result, i.e.  [Graphics:../Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_37.gif].

To prove part (iii), we let  [Graphics:../Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_38.gif]  be a real number.  By Definition 5.1,  

            [Graphics:../Images/ComplexFunExponentialMod_gr_39.gif]  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(c) 2006 John H. Mathews, Russell W. Howell